wp-signups.php
The post CSJ Provides Technical Support To Action Planning Meeting Of SWOFON In Niger appeared first on Centre for Social Justice .
]]>In the meeting, the most pressing challenges facing the SWOFON members were highlighted, and CSJ provided technical solutions to the challenges highlighted. Some of the highlighted challenges include: Poor allocation and utilization of agriculture budget; Poor gender sensitivity, disaggregation and specificity of agriculture budgets; Untimely release of funds for critical agricultural inputs and equipments; Limited information and participation in the budget process for rural women farmers; Weak oversight of agriculture support services and budget.
CSJ provided recommendations and technical support on practical steps that could be taken to overcome the challenges faced by SWOFON members.
The technical support stems from CSJs effort in establishing a baseline through research on the credibility of federal and state level budgets in terms of amounts of expenditure budgeted and actual releases and utilization.
The technical support stems from CSJs studies on the link between appropriation and plans and policies in agriculture. This is in recognition of the fact that Nigeria is a signatory to a plethora of international standards that demand improvements in gender relations. Nigeria has formulated national policies on agriculture and gender in agriculture.
Also, the Small-Scale Women Farmers Organisation in Nigeria (SWOFON) has designed a Charter of Demands, hence there is need for the women farmers to know how much of the contents of the Charter are provided for in national and state budgets. The project is in line with CSJs intervention in determining the level of involvement of citizens including SWOFON in the budgeting process, from the determination of priorities to other budget stages.
This also includes issues around transparency and accountability. The project is also in line with CSJs intervention in costing the contents of the SWOFON Charter of Demands to determine whether the resources required are within the affordability reach of the State and the likely time frame required to implement the Charter.
The post CSJ Provides Technical Support To Action Planning Meeting Of SWOFON In Niger appeared first on Centre for Social Justice .
]]>The post CSJ Provides Technical Support To The Action Planning Meeting Of SWOFON In Anambra appeared first on Centre for Social Justice .
]]>In the meeting, the most pressing challenges facing the SWOFON members were highlighted, and CSJ provided technical solutions to the challenges highlighted. Some of the highlighted challenges include: Poor allocation and utilization of agriculture budget; Poor gender sensitivity, disaggregation and specificity of agriculture budgets; Untimely release of funds for critical agricultural inputs and equipment; Limited information and participation in the budget process for rural women farmers; Weak oversight of agriculture support services and budget.
CSJ provided recommendations and technical support on practical steps that could be taken to overcome the challenges faced by SWOFON members.
The technical support stems from CSJs effort in establishing a baseline through research on the credibility of federal and state level budgets in terms of amounts of expenditure budgeted and actual releases and utilization. The technical support stems from CSJs studies on the link between appropriation and plans and policies in agriculture. This is in recognition of the fact that Nigeria is a signatory to a plethora of international standards that demand improvements in gender relations.
Nigeria has formulated national policies on agriculture and gender in agriculture. Also, the Small-Scale Women Farmers Organisation in Nigeria (SWOFON) has designed a Charter of Demands, hence there is need for the women farmers to know how much of the contents of the Charter are provided for in national and state budgets. The project is in line with CSJs intervention in determining the level of involvement of citizens including SWOFON in the budgeting process, from the determination of priorities to other budget stages. This also includes issues around transparency and accountability.
The project is also in line with CSJs intervention in costing the contents of the SWOFON Charter of Demands to determine whether the resources required are within the affordability reach of the State and the likely time frame required to implement the Charter.
The post CSJ Provides Technical Support To The Action Planning Meeting Of SWOFON In Anambra appeared first on Centre for Social Justice .
]]>The post CSJ Publishes Research Data on SGBV and Budget For Adamawa, Ebonyi, FCT, Lagos, Sokoto and Cross River State appeared first on Centre for Social Justice .
]]>The states are Adamawa, Ebonyi, Lagos, Sokoto, Cross River State and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Abuja.
These publications are the first of its type in the country and have become reference materials for SGBV and budgeting. The publications have laid the foundation for improved budgeting for SGBV as state MDAs working on SGBV have made references to the publications in their request for improved funding.
The publications contain relevant indicators on SGBV/VAWG/HP and SRHR in SDGs in the focal states, CEDAW and its substantive demands in the reporting process; National Gender Policy and its implementation framework; relevant indicators in the National Demographic and Health Survey, Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey and Nigerian Education Indicators among others.
They analyse and explain the budgeting framework and cycle; intervention points and strategies at the different parts of the cycle; minimum core contents and minimum core obligations of the bundle of rights associated violence against women; low hanging fruits for budgetary interventions as well as civil Society Engagement Strategies on SGBV/VAWG/HP and improvement of SRHR.
The post CSJ Publishes Research Data on SGBV and Budget For Adamawa, Ebonyi, FCT, Lagos, Sokoto and Cross River State appeared first on Centre for Social Justice .
]]>The post Eradicating Gender Stereotypes to Promote Equality appeared first on Centre for Social Justice .
]]>Men and women face different expectations about how they should dress, behave or work. Relations between men and women, whether in the family, the workplace or the public sphere, also reflect understandings of the talents, characteristics and behavior appropriate to women and men. Gender thus differs from sex in that it is social and cultural in nature rather than biological.
Gender stereotyping can limit the development of the natural talents and abilities of boys and girls, women and men, as well as their educational and professional experiences and life opportunities in general. It is harmful when it limits women’s and men’s capacity to develop their personal ability, pursue their professional careers and make choices about their lives. An example of wrongful gender stereotyping is the failure to criminalize marital rape based on societal perception of women as the sexual property of men, and the failure to investigate, prosecute and sentence sexual violence against women based on the stereotypes that women should protect themselves from sexual violence by dressing and behaving modestly.
Gender stereotypes, compounded and intersecting with other stereotypes have a disproportionate negative impact on certain groups of women, such as women from minority or indigenous groups, women with disabilities, women from lower caste groups or lower economic status, migrant women, etc. Stereotypes about women result from deeply engrained attitude, values, norms and prejudices against women. Universally, there are clear patterns of women’s inferior access to resources and opportunities. Women are systematically under-represented in decision making process that shape their societies. This pattern of inequality is a constraint to the progress of any society because it limits the opportunities of one half of its population. When women are constrained from reaching their potential, that potential is lost to the society as a whole.
Equality between men and women exists when both sexes are able to share equally in the distribution of power and influence; have equal opportunities for financial independence through work or through setting up businesses; enjoy equal access to education and the opportunity to develop personal ambitions, interests and talents; share responsibility for the home and children and are completely free from coercion, intimidation and gender-based violence both at work and at home.
However, it is important to acknowledge that where gender inequality exists, it is generally women who are excluded or disadvantaged in relation to decision-making and access to economic and social resources. Therefore, a critical aspect of promoting gender equality is the empowerment of women, with a focus on identifying and redressing power imbalances and giving women more autonomy to manage their own lives. This would enable them to make decisions and take actions to achieve and maintain their own reproductive and sexual health. Gender equality and women’s empowerment do not mean that men and women become the same; only that access to opportunities and life changes is neither dependent on, nor constrained by their sex.
On a global scale, achieving equality also requires eliminating harmful practices against women and girls, including sex trafficking, femicide, wartime sexual violence and other oppressive tactics. UNFPA stated that despite many international agreements affirming their human rights, women are still much more likely to be victims of domestic violence. The fact that gender attributes are socially constructed means that they are also amenable to change in ways that can make a society more just and equitable.
The international human rights framework prohibits gender stereotypes which undermine the enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms. Gender equality is the fifth of seventeen sustainable development goals of the United Nations. Gender equality is intrinsically linked to sustainable development and is vital for the realization of human rights for all. The overall objective of gender equality is a society in which women and men enjoy the same opportunities, rights and obligations in all spheres of life. States have obligation to eliminate discrimination against men and women in all areas of their lives. This obligation requires states to take measures to address gender stereotypes both in public and private life as well as refrain from stereotyping.
Gender mainstreaming is an approach of policy-making that takes into account both women’s and men’s interests and concerns. It was established as a major global strategy for the promotion of gender equality and empowerment of women in population and development activities. It requires the integration of a gender perspective to the content of different policies, and addressing the issue of representation of women and men in the given policy area. Gender mainstreaming therefore aims to strengthen the legitimacy of gender equality values by addressing known gender disparities and gaps in such areas as the division of labour between men and women; access to and control over resources; access to services, information and opportunities; and distribution of power and decision-making.
Gender mainstreaming, as a strategy, does not preclude interventions that focus only on women or only on men. Specific interventions aim to reduce identified gender disparities by focusing on equality or inequity as the objective rather than on men or women as a target group. In such a context, sex-specific interventions are still important aspects of a gender mainstreaming strategy. When implemented correctly, they should not contribute to a marginalization of men in such a critical area as access to reproductive and sexual health services. Nor should they contribute to the evaporation of gains or advances already secured by women. Rather, they should consolidate such gains that are central building blocks towards gender equality.
Evidently, we still have a long way to go before all the components of traditional gender stereotypes fully dissipate and recede, allowing men and women to be judged, and to judge themselves, on the basis of their merits, not their gender.
References
The post Eradicating Gender Stereotypes to Promote Equality appeared first on Centre for Social Justice .
]]>